Another Dark Little Corner
|
||
Started this before change to "New Blogger", as backup in case of trouble with digiphoto blog "In a Small Dark Room", or rants & links blog "Hello Cruel World" . Useful - at one stage Dark Room was there, but like the astrophysical Dark Matter, we could't see it ... better now, but kept Just In Case.
MY OTHER PLACES
Hello Cruel World (mirror) Chris' Memorial Site In a Small Dark Room
My Profile ...
OTHER'S PLACES Systema Naturae 2000 OTHER'S BLOGS Making Light Neil Gaiman's Journal Creek Running North Nothing New (Bellatrys) Body & Soul Digby (Hullabaloo) OzBlogs Corpuscle Olympics Road to Surfdom M Klishis (Random) Uncertain Principles --> Respectful of Otters Respectful Insolence on Mbaye Diagne Orcinus TinyURL — useful utility a Big Day To Main Page ARCHIVES 2002-10 2002-11 2003-03 2003-05 2003-06 2003-07 2003-08 2003-09 2003-10 2003-11 2003-12 2004-01 2004-02 2004-03 2004-04 2004-05 2004-06 2004-07 2004-08 2004-09 2004-10 2004-11 2004-12 2005-01 2005-02 2005-03 2005-04 2005-05 2005-06 2005-07 2005-08 2005-09 2005-10 2005-11 2005-12 2006-01 2006-02 2006-03 2006-04 2006-05 2006-06 2006-07 2006-08 2006-09 2006-10 2006-11 2006-12 2007-01 2007-02 2007-03 2007-04 2007-05 2007-06 2007-07 2007-08 2007-09 2007-10 2007-11 2007-12 2008-01 2008-02 2008-03 2008-04 2008-05 2008-06 2008-07 2008-09 2008-10 2008-11 2008-12 2009-01 2009-02 2009-03 2009-04 2009-05 2009-06 2009-07 2009-08 2009-09 2009-10 2009-11
There is nothing. There is no God and no universe, there is only empty space, and in it a lost and homeless and wandering and companionless and indestructible Thought. And I am that thought. And God, and the Universe, and Time, and Life, and Death, and Joy and Sorrow and Pain only a grotesque and brutal dream, evolved from the frantic imagination of that same Thought. Mark Twain (letter to Joseph Twichell after his wife's death) [me, on a bad day] WRITER'S LINKS Absolute Write Paypal donation button: Absolute Write is one of the leading sites for information on writing and publishing, especially the scam versions thereof. It has a broad, deep online community with an enormous message base going back years. Now it needs help. See the details and discussion here Preditors and Editors Everything you wanted to know about literary agents On the getting of agents Writer Beware Miss Snark Writer's Net (and my Wish List) |
2006-01-31
Some Online Photography; Local conflict/politics The Photography Channel The Digital Journalist - A Multimedia Magazine for Photojournalism in the Digital Age Changing the Face of Power: Women in the U.S. Senate Gallery - The Digital Journalist Angry Monkey Photography and one of my favourites, as seen in the sidebar, from top left pixel, the Daily Dose of Imagery Rolly Smallacombe wrote ... Local activists tried to stop the Harbour Bridge being built, they tried to stop the Opera House and so it goes. [1] http://www.thennewcity.info/ [2] http://g.msn.com/8HMAENAU/2755??PS=47575 ------------------------ I find this argument has very low validity. (But firstly, how sure are you of the truth of those two statements? And how do you define "local activists"?) I could also say "Local activists tried to stop the car park replacing the QVB" and "Local activists tried to stop the Redfern Housing Commission Towers being built". One campaign succeeded, one didn't, is the result of either better or worse for that? Indeed, along the lines of Gerard Henderson's article last year about Hitler having supported similar environmental ideals as the Green Party, I could similarly point out that he was a strong supporter of traditional Christianity, "Family Values", the protection of children from "degenerate social ideas", and healthy physical exercise. How do you think he improved his approval from a mere 30-odd percent in 1933 to a strong majority? It wasn't hate-speech and terror all the way. Tilly Devine & other sly-groggers fed money and support undercover to the temperance campaigners who kept 6-o'clock closing in force for many years by appealing to similar ideals. (And which were 'local activists' there?) Did that make the ideals wrong? Or the campaign right? So what if different people had different ideas before, and there was disussion of the best things to do? The point is whether the developments we are looking at now are good in themselves and good for the rest of the city, its society, and the supporting natural & artificial structures around it for the generations to come. Not solely whether people of influence can take a good profit out of it, return to *their* preferred residences, and leave the residents and future public good and funds to suffer: Leave them to pick up the pieces of social disruption, to do the extra maintenance and policing, and try to deal with all the problems as future economic swings go up and down, energy use changes so tall buildings are less viable, the methods of supplying and removing water and waste change, etc, etc, etc. And of course there are very strongly held views on several sides of these questions. I believe that there are good reasons to support my views on a number of issues, and I support those who argue for them. For various reasons, I've not been able to be very active in the community at all for a while now, but I do what little I can, and try to support those I agree with. On many other issues I have a fairly open mind, but try to apply my basic ethical principles to all, which are apparently at variance with some others'. (Luckily, for the moment, these differences can be safely discussed in Australia. Long may they remain so.)
Comments:
|